eCourse
Red Flag Warning: Patent Stakeholders Beware Shifting Double Patenting and Terminal Disclaimer Practice
Contains material from Jan 2025
Red Flag Warning: Patent Stakeholders Beware Shifting Double Patenting and Terminal Disclaimer Practice
5 out of 5 stars
What was the overall quality of the course (presentation, materials, and technical delivery)?
Rate the overall teaching effectiveness and presentation skills of faculty for the course.
How would you rate the value of the materials provided as part of the course?
Technical Questions?
512.475.6700
service@utcle.org
Both the courts and the USPTO are under pressure to address perceived problems with non-statutory obviousness-type double patenting rejections and terminal disclaimer practice. Let’s navigate the shifting sands of patent practice in view of the Federal Circuit’s wave-making obviousness-type double patenting decision last summer in In re: Cellect, LLC and the USPTO’s recent tsunami of a proposed rule that would upend current terminal disclaimer practice in response to obviousness-type double patenting rejections.
Includes: Video Audio Slides
- Total Credit Hours:
- 0.50
- Credit Info
- TX, CA
- TX MCLE credit expires: 1/31/2026
Preview mode.
You must be signed in, have purchased this eCourse,
and the eCourse must be active
to have full access.
Preview Sessions
Credit
Show session details
1.
Red Flag Warning: Patent Stakeholders Beware Shifting Double Patenting and Terminal Disclaimer Practice (Jan 2025)
Sarah D. Eddy
0.50
0.00
0.00
0.50
Preview Materials
Download session materials for offline use
Session 1 —29 mins 0.50
Red Flag Warning: Patent Stakeholders Beware Shifting Double Patenting and Terminal Disclaimer Practice (Jan 2025)
Both the courts and the USPTO are under pressure to address perceived problems with non-statutory obviousness-type double patenting rejections and terminal disclaimer practice. Let’s navigate the shifting sands of patent practice in view of the Federal Circuit’s wave-making obviousness-type double patenting decision last summer in In re: Cellect, LLC and the USPTO’s recent tsunami of a proposed rule that would upend current terminal disclaimer practice in response to obviousness-type double patenting rejections.
Originally presented: Nov 2024 Advanced Patent Law Institute
Sarah D. Eddy, Ph.D.,
Norton Rose Fulbright US LLP - Austin, TX